What are Kohlberg’s six stages of moral development?
What is Kohlberg learning theory?
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development is a theory that focuses on how children develop morality and moral reasoning. Kohlberg’s theory suggests that moral development occurs in a series of six stages. The theory also suggests that moral logic is primarily focused on seeking and maintaining justice.
What are the 6 stages of Kohlberg?
Kohlberg’s 6 Stages of Moral Development
- The full story. …
- Stage 1: Obedience and punishment. …
- Stage 2: Self-interest. …
- Stage 3: Interpersonal accord and conformity. …
- Stage 4: Authority and maintaining social order. …
- Stage 5: Social contract. …
- Stage 6: Universal ethical principles. …
- Pre-conventional level.
What is Kohlberg known for?
Lawrence Kohlberg, (born October 25, 1927, Bronxville, New York, U.S.—died January 17, 1987, Boston, Massachusetts), American psychologist and educator known for his theory of moral development.
What are the 3 stages of Kohlberg’s moral development?
There were three levels of moral reasoning that encompassed the six stages. Like Piaget, subjects were unlikely to regress in their moral development, but instead, moved forward through the stages: pre-conventional, conventional, and finally post-conventional.
How is Kohlberg’s theory applied in teaching and learning?
The theory tracks an individual’s level of moral reasoning by assigning him to one of six stages, where the first stage is a basic submission to authority and the last is universal ethics for all. As an educator, consider where your students’ personal development lies in terms of Kohlberg’s six stages.
How is Kohlberg’s theory used today?
Teachers Can Apply Kohlberg’s Model to Classroom Morality
By understanding this theory of moral development, teachers can help to guide the moral characters of their students and help them to become the best that they can be.
What is the highest level of Kohlberg’s moral development?
Stage 6: Universal ethical principle orientation
Stage 6: Universal ethical principle orientation
According to Kohlberg, this is the highest stage of functioning. However, he claimed that some individuals will never reach this level. At this stage, the appropriate action is determined by one’s self-chosen ethical principles of conscience.
How did Kohlberg develop his theory?
This theory was developed through an inspiration by the works of Jean Piaget. Kohlberg created this theory while studying at the University of Chicago for his bachelor’s degree. His contribution to the field of psychology took him in the league of the most renowned psychologists that the 20th century has produced.
What does a child considered to be good in Stage 2 of Kohlberg’s theory?
In Stage 2, for example, it would also be considered morally “good” to pay a classmate to do another student’s homework—or even to avoid bullying or to provide sexual favors—provided that both parties regard the arrangement as being fair.
What technique did Kohlberg use?
Kohlberg relied on a method of vignettes. He wrote up scenarios that involved a moral dilemma and presented them to his research subjects. He asked people what they would do in each situation and then asked them to explain the reasoning behind their decision.
What is Kohlberg’s conventional stage of morality?
Conventional morality is the second stage of moral development, and is characterized by an acceptance of social rules concerning right and wrong. At the conventional level (most adolescents and adults), we begin to internalize the moral standards of valued adult role models.
Should Heinz have stolen the drug?
Stage six (universal human ethics): Heinz should steal the medicine, because saving a human life is a more fundamental value than the property rights of another person. OR Heinz should not steal the medicine, because others may need the medicine just as badly, and their lives are equally significant.
What is Kohlberg’s dilemma?
The best known moral dilemma created by Kohlberg is the “Heinz” dilemma, which discusses the idea of obeying the law versus saving a life. Kohlberg emphasized that it is the way an individual reasons about a dilemma that determines positive moral development.
Is it OK to steal to save a life?
Would you steal to save a life? Yes, indeed. Fighting for justice is the right thing to do, even if that means breaking the law.
Should Brown report what he saw?
Brown, the police officer should report that he saw Heinz behaving suspiciously and running away from the laboratory because his boss would be pleased. Officer Brown should not report what he saw because his friend Heinz would be pleased.
Which of Kohlberg’s stages includes the Good Girl Good Boy Attitude?
In the Kohlberg theory of moral development in stage 3 i.e. good boy- good girl orientation of level, children maintain the respect of others and do what is expected from them.
What sentence should the judge give Heinz once he was caught?
YES: The judge should sentence Heinz to jail. Stealing is against the law. He should not make exceptions even though Heinz’ wife is dying.
Should Heinz have broken into the lab to steal the drug for his wife Why or why not?
Should Heinz have broken into the laboratory to steal the drug for his wife? Why or why not? It is only worth $200 and not how much the druggist wanted for it; Heinz had even offered to pay for it and was not stealing anything else. He will consequently be put in prison which will mean he is a bad person.
What is the correct answer to the Heinz dilemma?
Now, to solve this Heinz’s dilemma, the thinker has three options. Heinz should not steal the drug because it is the disobedience of law. Heinz can steal the drug but should be punished by the law. Heinz can steal the drug and no law should punish him.
How would you have responded to Heinz’s dilemma?
Responses to the Heinz dilemma: Stage one (obedience): Heinz should not steal the medicine, because he will consequently be put in prison. Stage two (self-interest): Heinz should steal the medicine, because he will be much happier if he saves his wife, even if he will have to serve a prison sentence.
Is stealing morally acceptable in some situations?
Usually one action, though morally right, violates another ethical standard. A classic example is stealing to feed your family. Stealing is legally and ethically wrong, but if your family is starving it might be morally justified.
Is it considered stealing to take pens from a bank?
While grabbing a pen isn’t necessarily considered stealing, you should just ask the teller if you have any doubts. That said, one pen is OK, but enough to stock your home office isn’t (the same goes for napkins).
What causes a person to steal?
Some people steal as a means to survive due to economic hardship. Others simply enjoy the rush of stealing, or steal to fill an emotional or physical void in their lives. Stealing may be caused by jealousy, low self-esteem, or peer-pressure. Social issues like feeling excluded or overlooked can also cause stealing.