What are the 4 conditions of the principle of double effect?
Classical formulations of the principle of double effect require that four conditions be met if the action in question is to be morally permissible: first, that the action contemplated be in itself either morally good or morally indifferent; second, that the bad result not be directly intended; third, that the good …
What is the principle of double effect in ethics?
This doctrine says that if doing something morally good has a morally bad side-effect it’s ethically OK to do it providing the bad side-effect wasn’t intended. This is true even if you foresaw that the bad effect would probably happen.
What is an example of the principle of double effect?
Abortions when the mother’s life is in danger
In cases when saving the life of a pregnant woman causes the death of her unborn child – for example, performing an abortion when continuing the pregnancy would risk killing the mother – some people argue that this is a case of the doctrine of double effect.
What is the principle of double effect in nursing?
The principle states that the risk of a negative known (foreseen), unintended consequence, or adverse effect of treatment can be justified if it was not the original and main intent of the action.
What is the principle of double effect quizlet?
What is the Doctrine of Double Effect? The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm, such as the death of a human being, as a side effect of promoting some good end.
Which condition of the doctrine of double effect requires proportionality quizlet?
Which condition of the Doctrine of Double Effect requires proportionality? The termination of human life is the only way to achieve the preservation of human life.
Where did the Doctrine of Double Effect originated from?
The first known example of double-effect reasoning is Thomas Aquinas‘ treatment of homicidal self-defense, in his work Summa Theologica.
Who wrote the doctrine of double effect?
Thomas Aquinas
Thomas Aquinas is credited with introducing the principle of double effect in his discussion of the permissibility of self-defense in the Summa Theologica (II-II, Qu.
What is the basis of morality according to Kant?
Kant believed that the shared ability of humans to reason should be the basis of morality, and that it is the ability to reason that makes humans morally significant. He, therefore, believed that all humans should have the right to common dignity and respect.
What are the 4 categorical imperatives?
- Outline.
- First formulation: Universality and the law of nature.
- Second formulation: Humanity.
- Third formulation: Autonomy.
- The Kingdom of Ends formulation.
- Application.
- Criticisms.
- See also.
- The full story. …
- Stage 1: Obedience and punishment. …
- Stage 2: Self-interest. …
- Stage 3: Interpersonal accord and conformity. …
- Stage 4: Authority and maintaining social order. …
- Stage 5: Social contract. …
- Stage 6: Universal ethical principles. …
- Pre-conventional level.
What are Kant’s principles?
Kant’s ethics are organized around the notion of a “categorical imperative,” which is a universal ethical principle stating that one should always respect the humanity in others, and that one should only act in accordance with rules that could hold for everyone.
What are Kant’s two categorical imperatives?
Here are two formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative: CIa: Always treat persons (including yourself) and ends in themselves, never merely as a means to your own ends. CIb: Act only on that maxim that you can consistently will to be a universal law.
What is the principle of consequentialism?
Consequentialism is a theory that says whether something is good or bad depends on its outcomes. An action that brings about more benefit than harm is good, while an action that causes more harm than benefit is not. The most famous version of this theory is utilitarianism.
What do you mean by the second formulation of categorical imperative?
The second formulation of the categorical imperative, called the principle of ends, states: “So act as to treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end and never as merely a means.”
Which of the following are the four components of ethical behavior?
There are four components of moral behavior: moral sensitivity, moral judgment, moral motivation, and moral character. To make moral assessments, one must first know what an action is intended to accomplish and what its possible consequences will be on others.
What are the four 4 stages of moral decision making?
Focusing on the process of understanding and resolving an ethical dilemma, James Rest (1994) developed a theoretical model of ethical decision making that involves four distinct psychological processes: moral awareness, moral judgment, moral intention, and moral action.
What are the 4 moral values?
The Four Values Framework: Fairness, Respect, Care and Honesty | SpringerLink.
What are the four components model?
Rest developed his Four-Component Model by asking: “What must happen psychologically in order for moral behavior to take place?” He concluded that ethical action is the product of these psychological subprocesses: (1) moral sensitivity (recognition); (2) moral judgment or reasoning; (3) moral motivation; and (4) moral …
What are the four components of an ethical framework select all that apply?
The most widely known is the one introduced by Beauchamp and Childress. This framework approaches ethical issues in the context of four moral principles: respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice (see table 1).
What are the six stages of moral development?
Kohlberg’s 6 Stages of Moral Development
What ethical principle is a justified claim on others?
What is a right? A right is a justified claim on others. For example, if I have a right to freedom, then I have a justified claim to be left alone by others.
What are the three concepts being promoted in the second ethical principle?
The three basic principles are (1) respect for persons, (2) beneficence, and (3) justice.
What are the five categories of risk identified under the concept of beneficence?
There are, for example, risks of psychological harm, physical harm, legal harm, social harm and economic harm and the corresponding benefits.